Differences Between Four-Carbon POE and Eight-Carbon POE [SMM Analysis]

Published: Jan 19, 2025 22:05 (GMT+8)
Polyolefin Elastomer (POE), a high-performance elastomer material, has garnered significant attention in modern material science. This article will explore the differences between two common types of POE: butene-based POE and octene-based POE...

 

Basic Structure and Preparation

Four-carbon POE is synthesized through the copolymerization of ethylene and 1-butene, while eight-carbon POE is the copolymerization product of ethylene and 1-octene. From a molecular structure perspective, both types of POE are random copolymers of ethylene and α-olefins, sharing similar basic structures. However, their performance differences mainly arise from variations in side chains.

Structural Characteristics and Physical Properties

The longer octene side chains in eight-carbon POE result in larger intermolecular distances. This structural characteristic endows eight-carbon POE with excellent elasticity and higher tensile strength. The long side chains of octene enhance the interaction forces between tie molecules, enabling the material to better withstand tensile stress.

In comparison, the shorter side chains of four-carbon POE lead to lower density and relatively higher crystallinity. This gives four-carbon POE higher liquidity during processing, as well as better high-temperature stability and heat resistance.

Downstream Applications

In downstream applications, four-carbon POE and eight-carbon POE are generally considered versatile. However, at the same density, eight-carbon POE exhibits better toughening effects than four-carbon POE. Eight-carbon POE can often be produced at lower densities (e.g., Exxon’s product 9061 achieves 0.86), giving it advantages in toughness and softness, especially under low-temperature conditions (e.g., -40°C).

Applications in Engineering Plastics

In engineering plastic applications, the choice of POE is not solely dependent on material softness. Eight-carbon POE is favored for its excellent low-temperature performance without requiring excessive softness. On the other hand, four-carbon POE, with its lower melting temperature and narrower molecular weight distribution, is more suitable for applications requiring high liquidity and high-temperature stability.

Conclusion

In summary, four-carbon POE and eight-carbon POE each have their own advantages and are suitable for different application scenarios. The high liquidity and high-temperature stability of four-carbon POE make it more marketable in industries with high-temperature demands, while eight-carbon POE’s superior low-temperature toughness and elasticity make it more competitive in the flexible materials field. When selecting a specific type of POE, comprehensive consideration should be given to the specific application requirements.

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM's internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or for more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
[SMM Announcement] Chinese Market Metal Prices and News Updates Suspended during National Day Holiday (Oct 1-7)
8 hours ago
[SMM Announcement] Chinese Market Metal Prices and News Updates Suspended during National Day Holiday (Oct 1-7)
Read More
[SMM Announcement] Chinese Market Metal Prices and News Updates Suspended during National Day Holiday (Oct 1-7)
[SMM Announcement] Chinese Market Metal Prices and News Updates Suspended during National Day Holiday (Oct 1-7)
8 hours ago
【Flash | Sivers Targets Over 100 Million Annual InP Laser Capacity】
10 hours ago
【Flash | Sivers Targets Over 100 Million Annual InP Laser Capacity】
Read More
【Flash | Sivers Targets Over 100 Million Annual InP Laser Capacity】
【Flash | Sivers Targets Over 100 Million Annual InP Laser Capacity】
Sivers Semiconductors announced a $30 million expansion of its indium phosphide (InP) manufacturing facility in Glasgow. Upon completion, the site is expected to support annual production of over 100 million CW DFB lasers. Work will begin in H2 2026, with operations targeted for Q4 2027. Sivers linked the investment to anticipated AI datacenter and optical-networking customer ramps and expects InP lasers and semiconductor optical amplifiers to play a growing role in energy-efficient optical connectivity. SMM views the expansion as direct medium-term support for high-purity indium demand. However, current output, utilization and indium intensity were not disclosed.
10 hours ago
[SMM PV Flash] China Huaneng Group Announces 1.5 GW PV Project
11 hours ago
[SMM PV Flash] China Huaneng Group Announces 1.5 GW PV Project
Read More
[SMM PV Flash] China Huaneng Group Announces 1.5 GW PV Project
[SMM PV Flash] China Huaneng Group Announces 1.5 GW PV Project
On September 17, the Suichang Branch of the Lishui Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau in Zhejiang Province issued a public notice regarding the acceptance of the environmental impact assessment documents for the Huaneng Suichang 1.5 million kW agrivoltaic complementary PV power generation project. According to the notice, the project is located on garden plots in six townships of Suichang County, Lishui City, Zhejiang Province: Dazhe Town, Shilian Town, Jinzhu Town, Hushan Township, Jiaotan Township, and Caiyuan Township. It is to be constructed by the Clean Energy Branch of Huaneng (Zhejiang) Energy Development Co., Ltd., with a total investment of 5,186,042,300 yuan. The planned scale of the PV plant for this project is an AC-side installed capacity of 1,491.3 MW and a DC-side installed capacity of 1,514.71894 MW. The power generation system adopts a block-based generation and centralized grid connection approach, with all generation units using string inverters and a centralized step-up scheme.
11 hours ago